But, one thing is for sure, they all do agree that is very “dislocated”, as Little suggests, and “metaphoric” as Freeman states(Little, Freeman).There is something in the play that goes beyond the normal realm of reality and that is what they are all trying to find out.
But, one thing is for sure, they all do agree that is very “dislocated”, as Little suggests, and “metaphoric” as Freeman states(Little, Freeman).There is something in the play that goes beyond the normal realm of reality and that is what they are all trying to find out.Tags: Solving For X ProblemsAssignment Writing UkDba Dissertation TopicsEssays About Orlando FloridaUnique Topics For Argumentative EssaysStanford Essay QuestionEssay On Place Of Historical Interest
Octavius possesses control over Antony when he is in Rome and Cleopatra when he is in Egypt.
Therefore, he claims that it is not the lack of character that is important (because it is there, just not in Antony’s control), but the location which is of importance and Adelman misses this (Freeman).
He comfortably states that Antony is “courageous, passionate and loyal”, especially when he deals with grief (Freeman).
He must be reading very deeply into what Adelman missed, or he could be projecting these traits onto Antony and they aren’t really there.
and lastly, “Did Antony’s ships join Octavius because of Cleopatra’s orders or was someone else, possibly even Antony himself, to blame for Antony’s final betrayal?
” (Adelman) These questions are left unanswered for an open interpretation.
He says that Antony does have character that is demonstrated, but the relationship with Egypt throws it off.
He claims that Egypt is a place of “illusions, charms, enchantments, playing, dreaming, and acting” (Ornstein).
However, this is right at the point where control is shifting.
If Ornstein is correct, Antony is about to go back under Octavius’ control, which would explain why Cleopatra is questioning.