The specific arguments allow that some wars at some times may be moral and/or justified, but they are used to object to some war in particular as failing to meet just standards. Is pacifism a result of being naive, or of being committed to nonviolent principles?Tags: Dissertation Appendix ExampleSolving Gas Law ProblemsPtlls Assignment EssaysLiterature Review Of CsrThesis Print Binding OxfordProblem Solving Worksheets For Grade 1How To Write An Example EssayDissertation Project Plan
Human beings have been fighting each other since prehistoric times, and people have been discussing the rights and wrongs of it for almost as long.
This section of the BBC Ethics site covers a wide range of the issues involved.
“The employment of organized violence means one must, in fact, abandon fixed and established values”.
(Chris Hedges, War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning) It is clear that the way in which the United States approached the war in Iraq was in fact due to, in some regard, the dropping of the atomic bombs in Japan, and the ensuing debate that it created thereafter.
He has not watched his best friend die in his arms after being hit my enemy fire.
He is an onlooker, free to analyze and critique every aspect of the war from the safety of his office.This objection accepts that a state may have a vested interest in pursuing attackers and even killing them, but points out that the justice involved with such actions is quickly offset when innocent lives are put at risk or even lost.Life Is Sacred The pacifist position against war or violence generally is often based upon the deontological argument that all of life (or just all human life) is sacred, and hence it is immoral to ever act in a way which would cause the deaths of others.Wars Risk the Future of the Human Race The generally limited nature of warfare, even at its most brutal, ended after World War II with the development of nuclear weapons.Between those and the vastly improved biological and chemical weapons which have become standard in the military arsenals of so many nations, the destructive capacity of even a single conflict has grown to such proportions that no one can pretend to be uninvolved and unaffected.When differences cannot be solved or compromised through mediation with an opposing party, war is the last remaining option.Muslim historian Ibn Khaldun wrote in fourteenth-century Spain, that “War is a universal and inevitable aspect of life, ordained by God to the same extent as the sky and the earth, the heat and the cold.Nor is he even mindful of fighting for his country. To stay alive, he must kill the enemy, destroy the enemy.The longer the war persists, the more likely he will not go home alive.The truth is probably somewhere in between, which may explain why society can't quite decide how to react to pacifism and pacifist critiques of society's violence.Killing Innocent People is Wrong One of the most common antiwar arguments is the fact that wars result in the deaths of innocent people and, therefore, war is necessarily immoral.