Repeal The Second Amendment Essay

The amendment then has to be approved by three quarters of the states.

Tags: Business Plan Structure PdfThesis Statements For The Scarlet LetterA Quick Reference To Essay Writing By Steven SternArgumentative Essay Gun ControlDemand Evidence And Think CriticallySwimming Essay In English140 Word EssaysParaphrasing AssignmentDissertation Institution Administrative

Stevens is calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment to allow for significant gun control legislation.

The 97-year-old Stevens says in an essay on The New York Times website that repeal would weaken the National Rifle Association's ability to "block constructive gun control legislation." (AP Photo)FILE - In this April 30, 2014, file photo, retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens testifies on the ever-increasing amount of money spent on elections as he appears before the Senate Rules Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington.

He had previously called for changing the Second Amendment to permit gun control. In his essay published Tuesday, Stevens talks about the “March for Our Lives” events on Saturday which drew crowds in cities across the country.

Stevens says the decision in that case, District of Columbia v. Stevens said the demonstrations “reveal the broad public support for legislation to minimize the risk of mass killings of schoolchildren and others in our society.”He said the support “is a clear sign to lawmakers to enact legislation prohibiting civilian ownership of semiautomatic weapons, increasing the minimum age to buy a gun from 18 to 21 years old, and establishing more comprehensive background checks on all purchasers of firearms.”But Stevens called on demonstrators to “seek more effective and more lasting reform.”“They should demand a repeal of the Second Amendment,” he wrote.

The 97-year-old Stevens says in an essay on The New York Times website that repeal would weaken the National Rifle Association's ability to "block constructive gun control legislation." (AP Photo)WASHINGTON (AP) — Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens is calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment to allow for significant gun control legislation.

The 97-year-old Stevens says in an essay on The New York Times website that repeal would weaken the National Rifle Association’s ability to “block constructive gun control legislation.”Stevens was on the losing end of a 2008 ruling in which the high court held that the Second Amendment gives individuals the right to own a gun for self-defense. with a propaganda weapon of immense power.” Stevens retired from the court in 2010, after more than 35 years.That is exactly why Trump tweeted, "We need more Republicans in 2018 and must ALWAYS hold the Supreme Court!"That, of course, is the president's not-so-subtle reference to his hope that liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 85, and the swing vote Anthony Kennedy, 80, step down during his term.In the last serious legislative effort in 2013, Democrats anointed as their point man Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia, perhaps the party’s most avowed supporter of the Second Amendment who campaigned for election with an ad in which he loaded a rifle and fired a bullet through a piece of climate-change legislation.Despite an overt appeal to gun owners, Manchin’s background-check bill fell short, too.Now, some on the left say the movement’s tactics and consensus-driven strategy have conceded too much to the NRA and gun-rights supporters.“For years, established gun organizations have asked for half a loaf and walked away with a quarter, if anything at all.Oftentimes, nothing at all,” said Igor Volsky, a deputy director at the liberal Center for American Progress who founded Guns Down.Repealing the amendment would be extremely difficult.An amendment to the Constitution can only be proposed either by Congress with a two thirds vote in both houses or by a constitutional convention called for by two thirds of the state legislatures.More recently, liberal activists started a group called Guns Down after the 2016 Pulse nightclub massacre in Orlando to promote a more aggressive political and policy campaign against firearms.The new players in the gun-control advocacy space have not, however, dramatically widened the scope of proposals to reduce gun violence.