He strongly puts his ideas on the ongoing question of if poetry should be natural or written as per the predetermined artificial rules set by the classical poets.This essay by Pope is neoclassical in its premises; in the tradition of Horace and Boileau.Tags: Thesis Theme RemoveArtificial Intelligence AssignmentHow To Cheat On Math HomeworkHow To Write An Essay On A NovelWhat To Include In A College Transfer EssayPtlls Assignment 3The Importance Of Being Bilingual. EssayGis Health Thesis
Decorum, for Pope, is the proper balance between expression and sound of content and form and it comes under versification.
Pope considers wit as the polished and decorated form of language. Artist uses ‘heroic couplet’ (form) to express the heroic subject matter (content).
Artist can’t go beyond his intention, he is limited within his desires.
He should not be over ambitious and over imaginative but critics can go beyond their intention.
Clearly, the poet must have a strong sense of literary tradition in order to make intelligent judgments as the critic must have it too.
Pope notes Virgil’s discovery that to imitate Homer is also to imitate nature. His nature is the combination of two elements society (human nature) and rules of classical artists-“nature is methodized”.The account of his life as a rock critic which follows is different from the account which kicks off his 1973 collection, Any Old Way You Choose It if only because in 1998 he is making sense of a critical life that in 1977 was still being sketched out."I want to do other things in the world than write rock criticism," he had written in Any Old Way You Choose It.We are well used now to academics who dabble in rock criticism and rock critics who dabble in the academy.There are schools of rock criticism which are clearly "academic," even if written by journalists with no academic credentials at all, and classes in rock criticism taught by instructors who have never written a critical line in their lives.Alexander Pope's Essay on Criticism is an ambitious work of art written in heroic couplet.Published in 1711, this poetic essay was a venture to identify and define his own role as a poet and a critic.Christgau is not a bohemian as a matter of fact--his life as loving husband and father is crucial for his critical persona--nor as a writer.He lacks the narcissistic mischief making and sheer self pity of a Richard Meltzer or, come to that, Lester Bangs.Pope claims that artists possess genius whereas critics possess taste (classical taste developed by classical artist).By taking the ideas of classical artists, a critic has to judge the text.